The United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the Department of State, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology are jointly encouraging the global community of AI experts to help guide them as they shape a formidable strategy for AI’s role in global development.
Following reporting by FedScoop, Amazon stated that the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) disclosure about the FBI beginning to use its Rekognition tool does not signify a violation of its moratorium on facial recognition.
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has voiced its concerns about the need for federal agencies to improve their communication and documentation practices, in an attempt to further assist Congress in providing legislative oversight.
The White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has made a public call for suggestions on how federal agency privacy impact assessments could address the escalating risks with the increasing complexity of technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI).
In the increasingly important world of artificial intelligence (AI), Steve Sousa, Senior Vice President at CGI’s federal arm, advocates that its integration offer federal health care agencies ample opportunities to improve patient outcomes.
In a recently unveiled “white paper,” Chief of Space Operations Gen. Chance Saltzman emphasizes the critical importance of timely and active space domain awareness (SDA) in American defense strategy.
The National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource (NAIRR) pilot began in January 2024 with an unusual coalition: the National Science Foundation, other federal agencies, and dozens of private-sector and nonprofit contributors offering compute, datasets, models, platforms, training, and expertise. The coalition was correctly celebrated as evidence that the United States could mobilize resources across institutional boundaries.
Collaboration, however, is not self-governance.
When public research infrastructure depends on contributed commercial resources, the central design question is not whether industry should participate. It should. Industry operates much of the world's advanced AI infrastructure and holds expertise that a public program cannot recreate quickly. The hard question is whether the resulting system advances an independent public mission—or quietly becomes a distribution channel for the technical architectures, pricing models, and research priorities of its largest contributors.
The distinction turns on institutional design. A durable NAIRR must be able to accept private contributions without becoming dependent on any particular donor; offer researchers useful proprietary capabilities without making their work nonportable; and learn from vendors without delegating public allocation and assurance decisions to them.
In short, a national resource should be grateful for donations but architected to survive their withdrawal.