Skip to content

Government Technology

DHS Launches AI Corps, Calls for 50 AI Experts to Drive Tech Transformation The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is initiating a “hiring sprint” to assemble a team of 50 artificial intelligence (AI) experts for its newly established AI Corps. The AI Corps, modeled after the U.S. Digital Service, aims to leverage AI technology across various DHS operations. Experts in the AI Corps will contribute to countering illegal drug activities, combating child exploitation, providing immigration services, ensuring national security, protecting critical infrastructure, and enhancing cybersecurity. This move aligns with President Joe Biden’s AI executive order and demonstrates the government’s commitment to hiring AI talent to drive technological advancements in the federal sector. DHS plans to expedite the hiring process using flexible authorities to secure qualified candidates promptly. The goal is to responsibly harness AI capabilities, mitigate misuse, and advance the critical mission of homeland security.

DHS Launches AI Corps, Calls for 50 AI Experts to Drive Tech Transformation

In a significant step toward growing its artificial intelligence capabilities, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is launching the “AI Corps”. The agency is recruiting 50 specialized AI talents to drive the utilization of AI throughout DHS operations.

DHS’s Initial AI Inventory: Verification Issues Highlighted by Watchdog Report

A recent investigation has raised questions regarding the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)’s handling of Artificial Intelligence (AI) use case submissions. According to a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, DHS was not confirming the authenticity of reported AI applications.

DoD’s AI Office Unveils 5 ‘Big Plays’ for FY24

DoD’s AI Office Unveils ‘Big Plays’ for FY24

The Department of Defense’s (DoD) top procurement official for AI, Quentin McCoy, recently shared the five major objectives for the Pentagon’s AI office for the rest of fiscal 2024. These objectives demonstrate a vital blend of broad aspirations and detailed acquisition strategies.

Introducing the Leaders of U.S. AI Safety Institute: Director and CTO Revealed Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo has announced the appointment of Elizabeth Kelly, a White House National Economic Council adviser, as the inaugural director of the U.S. AI Safety Institute (USAISI). Kelly will provide leadership and oversight to the institute, coordinating AI policy and technical initiatives. Elham Tabassi, Chief AI Adviser at the National Institute for Standards and Technology, has been selected as the USAISI’s chief technology officer. Tabassi will shape AI research efforts and identify and mitigate AI safety risks. The appointments highlight the commitment to advancing AI safety and responsible innovation in the United States.

U.S. AI Safety Institute Announces Director and Chief Technology Officer

Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo has announced the appointment of National Economic Council adviser, Elizabeth Kelly, to lead the newly formed U.S. AI Safety Institute (USAISI). In addition, Elham Tabassi has been named the chief technology officer for the institute.

Streamlining OSD IT Management: Administrative Instruction Defines DOD Component Responsibilities

DOD Outlines Roles & Responsibilities of Several Components for OSD IT, Information Management Support

The Office of the Performance Improvement Officer (PIO) at the Department of Defense (DOD) has published a document detailing the roles and responsibilities of multiple DOD components. The focus lies in providing information management and information technology support for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). The original article can be found here .

International Defense Cooperation: Demonstrating the Potential of Uncrewed Robotic Vehicles in Joint Trial

International Defense Cooperation: Demonstrating the Potential of Uncrewed Robotic Vehicles in Joint Trial

Introduction

The Department of Defense (DoD) recently collaborated with its counterparts from the United Kingdom and Australia to conduct field trials of various robotic vehicles and sensors. The trials took place in late 2023 at the Cultana Training Area in South Australia and are a testament to global cooperation in advancing defense technology.

Microsoft’s Azure OpenAI Service Goes Live on Government Cloud Platform Microsoft has launched its Azure OpenAI Service on the Azure Government platform, giving federal agencies access to AI tools in a more regulated environment. Candice Ling, senior vice president of Microsoft’s federal government business, highlighted the data safety measures of the service and its potential for productivity and innovation. The company is also seeking federal cloud services authorizations, including FedRAMP’s “high” baseline and the Department of Defense’s Impact Levels 4 and 5, to allow the use of higher-impact data with the system. Governments agencies are increasingly experimenting with AI technologies and crafting their own policies for the use of generative AI tools.

Microsoft’s Azure OpenAI Service Goes Live on Government Cloud Platform

A defining move in the application of artificial intelligence (AI) to government services, Microsoft has launched its Azure OpenAI service on the Azure Government platform. This launch comes as the company is seeking FedRAMP authorization for handling high-impact data.

A Successful AI Pilot Is Not Yet a Durable Institution

Revised and substantially expanded July 17, 2026, including the subsequent legislative and program record.

In February 2024, lawmakers supporting the Creating Resources for Every American To Experiment with Artificial Intelligence Act—the CREATE AI Act—were optimistic that Congress would formally establish the National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource (NAIRR). At the same time, the National Science Foundation had already launched a pilot under executive direction and existing authorities.

That combination created an easy but misleading story: the pilot was underway, bipartisan support was growing, and legislation would simply make the program permanent.

The harder institutional question is what permanent should mean.

A pilot can demonstrate demand, test operating processes, and mobilize voluntary contributions. It cannot by itself guarantee multi-year infrastructure, stable access for long-running research, independent governance, predictable appropriations, enforceable duties, or continuity across administrations. Those are not administrative details surrounding a technical program. They determine what kind of national capability the program becomes.

NAIRR needs legislation not merely so that it continues to exist, but so that its public obligations survive the incentives and relationships that made the pilot possible.

READER-NEUTRAL SUBSCRIPTION

Follow Field Notes via RSS.

Copy this address into the RSS reader you already use. New notes will appear there automatically—no account, email address, or tracking required.

Open the feed