Skip to content

INDEPENDENT RESEARCH / PRACTICE NOTES

Ideas in motion, not ideas behind glass.

This is my working notebook on AI engineering, strategy, knowledge infrastructure, organizational transformation, and the human systems that determine whether innovation becomes real capability.

The notes range from emerging research questions to practical operating models. Some will become papers, tools, talks, or products. Others are here because thinking improves when it is made visible.

Evidence before theater Systems over slogans Useful, accountable AI

Subscribe via RSS Follow Field Notes in any feed reader

Latest writing

Technology transition begins when the prototype changes owners

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has transferred an experimental H-60Mx Black Hawk equipped with Sikorsky autonomy technology to the U.S. Army for advanced operational testing. The transition marks the culmination of the Aircrew Labor In-Cockpit Automation System program.

It is a substantial technical milestone. It is also the beginning of a different kind of work: transferring enough knowledge, authority, and learning capacity for a receiving organization to make the capability its own.

Monitoring deployed AI is a knowledge practice

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has published a report on the challenges of monitoring deployed artificial intelligence systems. It addresses a growing operational reality: predeployment testing cannot anticipate every combination of user, data, environment, and system change.

Monitoring is the bridge between what a team expected and what the deployed system is actually doing. Building that bridge requires more than a dashboard.

Stateful agents make memory a governance problem

OpenAI and Amazon have announced a strategic partnership that includes plans to co-develop a stateful runtime environment for artificial intelligence agents. The phrase “stateful” deserves attention. An agent that can preserve context across steps and sessions may be more useful than one that repeatedly starts from zero.

It may also accumulate assumptions, permissions, and mistakes that no one intended to become durable.

A benchmark score needs an uncertainty model

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has published a report on expanding artificial intelligence evaluation with statistical models. Its central implication is easy to state and surprisingly easy to neglect: an evaluation result is an estimate.

Organizations often present model scores to one decimal place while leaving the population, sampling assumptions, and uncertainty largely invisible. That precision can exceed what the evidence supports.

A scientific companion should strengthen the evidence chain

Google DeepMind has described new results using Gemini Deep Think for mathematical and scientific discovery. The work is another indication that advanced models can contribute more than polished explanations: they can explore candidate approaches, connect ideas, and help experts work through difficult problems.

The most useful interpretation is not that the scientist is leaving the loop. It is that the loop itself can become richer—if the system preserves the evidence needed for expert challenge.

Capability gating is a cybersecurity control

OpenAI has introduced Trusted Access for Cyber, an approach intended to expand advanced cybersecurity capabilities for legitimate defenders while placing additional controls around uses that could create harm.

The initiative highlights a problem that every organization deploying powerful artificial intelligence now faces: access control cannot stop at whether somebody may use a model. It has to consider which capabilities they may invoke, under what conditions, with what evidence, and through which escalation path.

A benchmark needs a theory of use

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has released draft guidance on best practices for automated benchmark evaluations. The subject sounds technical, but it reaches directly into strategy and procurement. Organizations routinely use benchmark results to choose models, justify investment, and communicate readiness.

A benchmark can support those decisions. It can also lend numerical confidence to a question it was never designed to answer.

READER-NEUTRAL SUBSCRIPTION

Follow Field Notes via RSS.

Copy this address into the RSS reader you already use. New notes will appear there automatically—no account, email address, or tracking required.