Skip to content

INDEPENDENT RESEARCH / PRACTICE NOTES

Ideas in motion, not ideas behind glass.

This is my working notebook on AI engineering, strategy, knowledge infrastructure, organizational transformation, and the human systems that determine whether innovation becomes real capability.

The notes range from emerging research questions to practical operating models. Some will become papers, tools, talks, or products. Others are here because thinking improves when it is made visible.

Evidence before theater Systems over slogans Useful, accountable AI

Subscribe via RSS Follow Field Notes in any feed reader

Latest writing

Federal AI governance is moving into the operating model

Two April 3 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) memoranda make federal artificial intelligence (AI) policy more operational: M-25-21 on agency AI use and governance and M-25-22 on AI acquisition.

Policies change across administrations. The durable lesson in these documents is institutional: trustworthy use has to be built into roles, inventories, procurement, measurement, and delivery practice.

Adversarial AI needs a shared language before it needs another tool

Security teams and artificial intelligence (AI) teams can look at the same system and see different attack surfaces. One sees identities, networks, software dependencies, and data flows. The other sees training distributions, model behavior, embeddings, prompts, and evaluation drift.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) publishes its adversarial machine-learning taxonomy on March 24 to create a more consistent vocabulary for attacks and mitigations across predictive and generative systems.

Cyber defense needs machines that can explain the patch

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's (DARPA) March 19 release sets the final competition procedures for its Artificial Intelligence Cyber Challenge (AIxCC). Seven teams are set to test cyber reasoning systems against real-world open-source software, with scoring for finding vulnerabilities, generating patches, and analyzing bug reports.

That is a demanding and useful test. The harder transition begins after a machine writes a patch that appears to work.

Agent platforms make observability part of the product

OpenAI's March 11 release introduces new tools for building agents: the Responses application programming interface, built-in web and file search, computer use, an Agents software development kit, and integrated tracing.

The announcement reduces the amount of custom plumbing required to create systems that can pursue goals across tools. It also makes a deeper point visible: in an agentic system, observability is not support infrastructure. It is part of the product.

Thunderforge will be judged by the planning system around it

Military planning is a coordination technology. It turns incomplete information, command intent, operational constraints, staff expertise, and adversary uncertainty into courses of action that can be compared and executed.

The Defense Innovation Unit's (DIU) March 5 announcement introduces Thunderforge, an initiative to bring artificial intelligence (AI) agents, modeling, simulation, and large language models into operational and theater-level planning. The stated ambition is faster synthesis, course-of-action development, and AI-enabled wargaming.

Coding agents change the shape of engineering work

The February 24 preview of Claude Code is more consequential than another improvement in code completion. The tool can search a repository, edit files, run tests, and use command-line tools to carry out a substantial engineering task.

That changes the unit of delegation. Instead of asking artificial intelligence to suggest the next line, a developer can ask it to pursue an outcome.

Simulation is becoming part of the decision-support stack

Microsoft's February 19 introduction of Muse presents an artificial intelligence (AI) model capable of generating video-game visuals and controller actions. It is trained as a World and Human Action Model (WHAM), learning both how an environment changes and how people act within it.

Gaming is the immediate application. The larger signal is that generative simulation is moving closer to an interactive design material.

AI adoption begins with tasks, not job titles

Conversations about artificial intelligence and work often begin at the wrong level. They ask which jobs will disappear, then argue over forecasts that are too coarse to guide an actual organization.

Anthropic's first Economic Index, published February 10, analyzes how people use Claude across occupational tasks. The report finds usage concentrated in particular kinds of work and distinguishes between automation, where the model performs a task, and augmentation, where people and the model work together.

READER-NEUTRAL SUBSCRIPTION

Follow Field Notes via RSS.

Copy this address into the RSS reader you already use. New notes will appear there automatically—no account, email address, or tracking required.