Skip to content

INDEPENDENT RESEARCH / PRACTICE NOTES

Ideas in motion, not ideas behind glass.

This is my working notebook on AI engineering, strategy, knowledge infrastructure, organizational transformation, and the human systems that determine whether innovation becomes real capability.

The notes range from emerging research questions to practical operating models. Some will become papers, tools, talks, or products. Others are here because thinking improves when it is made visible.

Evidence before theater Systems over slogans Useful, accountable AI

Subscribe via RSS Follow Field Notes in any feed reader

Latest writing

Simulation is becoming part of the decision-support stack

Microsoft's February 19 introduction of Muse presents an artificial intelligence (AI) model capable of generating video-game visuals and controller actions. It is trained as a World and Human Action Model (WHAM), learning both how an environment changes and how people act within it.

Gaming is the immediate application. The larger signal is that generative simulation is moving closer to an interactive design material.

AI adoption begins with tasks, not job titles

Conversations about artificial intelligence and work often begin at the wrong level. They ask which jobs will disappear, then argue over forecasts that are too coarse to guide an actual organization.

Anthropic's first Economic Index, published February 10, analyzes how people use Claude across occupational tasks. The report finds usage concentrated in particular kinds of work and distinguishes between automation, where the model performs a task, and augmentation, where people and the model work together.

Frontier safety must be governed as a moving threshold

When a technology changes quickly, a fixed policy can be obsolete while everyone is still complying with it.

Google DeepMind's February update to its Frontier Safety Framework addresses that problem by linking stronger safeguards to capability thresholds in areas that could create severe harm. The details will continue to evolve. The organizational principle should endure: controls should respond to what a system can do, not only to the name or generation printed on it.

The national laboratories are an unusually good test for AI

OpenAI's January 30 announcement makes its reasoning models available to scientists at Los Alamos, Lawrence Livermore, and Sandia national laboratories through a partnership using the Venado supercomputer.

The announcement covers an extraordinary range of possibilities: materials, energy, medicine, cybersecurity, mathematics, and nuclear security. Yet the laboratories are interesting not only because their problems are difficult. They are interesting because their knowledge practices are demanding.

A management-system certificate is a beginning, not a verdict

Anthropic's January 13 announcement reports that the company has achieved International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission (ISO/IEC) 42001 certification, making it one of the first frontier-model companies to certify an artificial intelligence management system against the new international standard.

That is meaningful. It is also easy to misunderstand.

World models need worlds worth trusting

Robots and autonomous vehicles need experience. The hard question is where that experience should come from when real-world data is expensive, dangerous, rare, or incomplete.

NVIDIA's January 6 announcement of Cosmos world foundation models offers one answer: generate and manipulate simulated physical environments at scale. The company presents the platform as infrastructure for training and evaluating physical artificial intelligence (AI) systems, including robotics and autonomous vehicles.

AI assurance has to survive contact with the mission

The first consequential defense artificial intelligence story of 2025 does not arrive as a new model or a weapons demonstration. It arrives as an invitation to test.

The Department of Defense's (DoD) Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office (CDAO) begins January with a crowdsourced assurance pilot in military medicine. The setting matters. A medical system can perform impressively on average and still fail a clinician or patient at exactly the wrong moment. Its quality cannot be separated from the people, workflow, uncertainty, and consequences around it.

READER-NEUTRAL SUBSCRIPTION

Follow Field Notes via RSS.

Copy this address into the RSS reader you already use. New notes will appear there automatically—no account, email address, or tracking required.